4 reasons why trading for Bradley Beal would be bad for the Cleveland Cavaliers
By Chad Porto
Declining and Overall Play
Bradley Beal had a bad 2021-2022 season. That’s not up for debate. He played just 40 games (more on that later) and shot his worst from the floor since he was 23. He fell off from scoring the ball, dropping his points per game total by eight full points, and his three-point shooting was abysmal, barely 30%.
There’s no reason to think he’ll ever be a 30-point scorer a game ever again. Why would he? Especially on the Cavs? Beal isn’t anything impressive outside of his ability to score. He’s not a great passer, he can’t help rebounding and his defense is bad.
Frankly, and I mean this, Collin Sexton looks like a better fit with the Cavaliers than Beal.
Beal isn’t the superstar so many think or want him to be. He’s had one All-NBA nod and it was on a team that saw him jack up 22 shots a game just to finish with 34 wins. Beal isn’t that guy. We’ve seen real All-NBA guys and what they’re capable of. For the price of his game, he’s just not worth investing in.
Not when the one thing he’s good at, scoring, can be had for cheaper with Sexton. Give Sexton a shot and avoid having to pay hand over fist for Beal and his bloated reputation.